🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, coercive communications continued. Originally, allegedly from a former police officer and an ex-military commander, later from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, a local artisan asserts he was summoned to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

This third-generation resident is part of a group fighting a high-value initiative where this historic settlement – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – will be demolished and redeveloped by a multinational conglomerate.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is exceptional in the world," explains the protester. "Yet their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and stop us speaking out."

Opposing Environments

The cramped lanes of the slum present a dramatic difference to the towering buildings and elite residences that dominate the area. Residences are assembled randomly and often without proper sanitation, informal businesses emit toxic smoke and the air is permeated by the unpleasant stench of uncovered waste channels.

For certain residents, the prospect of a renewed Dharavi into a modern district of high-end towers, organized recreational areas, modern retail complexes and homes with multiple bathrooms is a hopeful vision realized.

"We lack adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or water management and we have no places for children to play," says a tea vendor, 56, who relocated from his home state in 1982. "The only way is to clear the area and build us new homes."

Resident Opposition

But others, including the leather artisan, are resisting the redevelopment.

None deny that Dharavi, historically ignored as informal housing, is in stark need investment and development. Yet they are concerned that this plan – lacking resident participation – is one that will convert premium city property into a playground for the rich, evicting the marginalized, migrant communities who have lived there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these marginalized, displaced people who developed the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of local enterprise and commercial output, whose economic value is estimated at between $1m and two million dollars a year, making it one of the world's largest informal economies.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately 1 million inhabitants living in the crowded sprawling area, fewer than half will be able for new homes in the development, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Others will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the remote edges of the city, threatening to divide a generations-old community. A portion will be denied homes at all.

Residents permitted to remain in the neighborhood will be provided units in high-rise buildings, a major break from the natural, collective approach of residing and operating that has sustained Dharavi for so long.

Commercial activities from clothing production to clay work and waste processing are likely to reduce in scale and be moved to a specific "industrial sector" separated from residential areas.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of Shaikh, a craftsman and long-time inhabitant to live in this community, the project presents a survival challenge. His makeshift, three-storey operation makes apparel – sharp blazers, suede trenches, studded bomber jackets – distributed in premium stores in upscale neighborhoods and internationally.

His family resides in the rooms underneath and employees and tailors – migrants from other states – also sleep on-site, permitting him to manage costs. Outside this community, accommodation prices are frequently significantly more expensive for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

In the government offices in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the transformation initiative illustrates a very different outlook. Well-groomed residents move around on two-wheelers and eco-friendly transport, purchasing western-style baked goods and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on a patio near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This represents a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and low-cost tea that supports local residents.

"This is not development for us," states the protester. "This constitutes a huge land development that will make it unaffordable for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists skepticism of the business conglomerate. Run by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and a supporter of the government head – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it disputes.

While local authorities labels it a joint project, the business group paid nearly a billion dollars for its 80% stake. A case stating that the initiative was questionably assigned to the business group is pending in the top court.

Continued Intimidation

Since they began to vocally oppose the redevelopment, Shaikh and other residents claim they have been subjected to ongoing efforts of coercion and warning – including communications, clear intimidation and insinuations that opposing the project was equivalent to speaking against the country – by people they assert represent the business conglomerate.

Included in these suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c