🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.